I'm a book junky. Always have been. If I had a buck for every hour I've logged
in a bookstore, I'd be driving a lot nicer car. If I had all the bucks I spent
in those stores, I'd be living in a lot bigger house. But fast cars and real
estate don't turn me on half as much as imagination and ideas. As I said, a
book junky. And to support my habit, I've taken to writing the damn things.
Not as blissful a career as I once imagined, but a bit less risky than stealing
car stereos, color TVs and VCRs.
My professional work for the last 10 years has also focused on the Internet,
so I've paid close attention to how books and computers have intersected. I was
an early beta tester for the Library of Congress Subject Headings as that classification
system evolved from huge unwieldy tomes to slick little CR-ROMs. The slickest
thing about them, to my mind, was the hypertext links they included: from overarching
categories like Science to narrower terms like Astronomy, Biology, Chemistry and
so on, and how these still-large categories were broken down in turn into increasingly
narrower subdivisions. I loved being able to surf that compact taxonomy of all
human knowledge, encountering related terms along the way -- pointers to categories
I otherwise would never have suspected. Getting a handle on the jargon of an unknown
field is a very large part of learning. I was fascinated by how explicit hypertext
links could facilitate such learning. I still am.
However, while these categories and their interrelationships illuminate much
in themselves, their whole point is to... well, point elsewhere -- in other
words, to link to actual works on these subjects. The Library of Congress maps
its subject headings to shelf locations. Books in Print, those other big tomes
that used to sit behind the counter of most bookstores, maps the same subject
headings to -- duh! -- books in print. These have also been turned into CD-ROMs
and are now usually hidden away on a PC.
Well,
so what? Let's get a bit less abstract. This morning's mail brought a book I ordered
last week: The
Spell of the Sensuous by David Abram. What is it about, you ask? Sounds
vaguely erotic, doesn't it? Well maybe, yeah, but with a twist you'd never get
from the title alone. Perhaps the easiest way to describe it is to quote the Library
of Congress Subject Headings on the book's copyright page:
The page doesn't say these are Library of Congress Subject Headings, but trust
me, they are. Maybe they don't really reveal all that much about what the book
is about -- what the heck is "human ecology" anyway? -- but at least now we
know it's not in the same ballpark with The
Story of O or Penthouse
Uncensored II.
Now suppose after reading it, I like The Spell of the Sensuous a lot
and want to find other books like it. I could ask my local bookseller to search
those subject headings for similar titles. However, even if I didn't encounter
a clerk who had no clue what I was asking for -- subject headings? wha...? --
I'd likely get back a fairly long list of equally puzzling titles. Which ones
might I find intriguing, useful? Which ones would I be likely to hate? Not a
lot to go on there.
Or,
I could look up the other authors who blurbed this book: Bill McKibben, James
Hillman, Gary Snyder, Theodore Roszak, etc. If I liked the book and they liked
it too, maybe I'd like what they wrote as well. We're homing in on the notion
of personal recommendations here. Some large online bookstores have automated
this with a technology known as collaborative filtering. You've no doubt encountered
this sort of thing in the form: "People who bought this book also bought..." followed
by a list of titles. Sophisticated algorithms generate these lists by correlating
thousands or even millions of purchases and finding potentially significant groupings.
Essentially, the software is uncovering genuine knowledge contributed to the site
by the human beings who bought from it.
As promising as this technology may be, two problems immediately arise. First,
the software is not only sophisticated, it's expensive. Second, marketers can't
resist the urge to "improve" the results, thus often destroying any real utility
that might have been delivered. I once encountered a recommendation that alerted
me to the "fact" that people who liked Hunter S. Thompson also seemed to buy
a lot of Harry Potter books. Me, I'm partial to both, but then I'm a little
weird. Let's just say I could feel the invisible hand of bestseller marketing
tweaking the collaborative filtering rules behind the scenes -- and not very
helpfully.
Independent web bookstores aren't usually awash in spare cash they can blow
on advanced software. Also, if they're smart, they're not trying to compete
head-to-head on Oprah picks and New York Times bestsellers with 800-pound
gorillas like Amazon and Barnes & Noble. What then can the Indies do to carve
out viable online market niches? For one thing, they can specialize. For another
(intimately related), they can leverage the new breed of *social* networks that
the Internet has spawned in such profusion. Time for another story...
For
a new book I'm working on (i.e., alternately praying to arcane gods, cursing,
and slamming my head against the wall), I recently compiled a list of books and
movies that dealt in some way with artificial intelligence, robotics or genetic
engineering. My interest here is in pop-culture perception, not academic erudition,
so the list was heavy on films and the books that had influenced or inspired them.
At first, I thought this would be a piece of cake, but I ended up spending several
days on this "little" project. It took me a while to realize that Mary Shelley's
Frankenstein
(1818) clearly belonged on the same list with "The Terminator" (1984)
and "The 6th Day" (2000). (Why Arnold Schwarzenegger stars in so many
of these flicks remains a minor mystery; send email if you know.)
I sent my initial list to a handful of online pals, asking if they could suggest
additions. Naively, I thought I'd included most of the obvious candidates. Shows
just how wrong you can be. A few email replies later, my list had nearly doubled.
Some books and films I'd simply overlooked. Others I missed because I wasn't
familiar (or familiar enough) with them. Even this small informal example demonstrates
the power of social networking. Being online is important, yes, but sharing
common interests is where the real power lies. Like-minded contacts quickly
amplify relevant knowledge.
Let's
backtrack for a second. If I walk into a bookstore and it has one big Science
section arranged by author's last name, I'm confronted with titles on everything
from bacteriology to quantum mechanics, all in a jumble. If the shelves are further
subdivided into Biology, Chemistry, Physics, and so on, I'm a little better off.
But still, I'm wishing I had a little more help here, especially if science is
not an area I'm deeply versed in (it's not). True, I could ask a clerk, but past
experience hasn't left me hopeful on this score. I once inquired about books by
William Faulkner at a big chain store. "Is that Western fiction?" the clerk asked?
She didn't mean like Western Civilization. She meant like Zane Gray and Louis
L'Amour. Minimum wage is a terrible thing to waste.
When bookstores first came online, they replicated the same old paper catalog
and shelf arrangement schemes typical of offline marketing and brick-and-mortar
store layout. Browse by subject, sure. And maybe by a half dozen subcategories.
And then... a deluge of undifferentiable book titles. "Page one of 50. Click
here to continue."
That doesn't do me any good. Nor am I usually interested (beyond a certain
morbid curiousty) in Top-40 lists. When I go searching books online, which is
often, I am nearly always looking for something beyond the bestsellers. I return
to book sites that offer the possibility of finding books I don't yet know about.
And to find them, I want to hook up with people who share my interests. If an
online bookshop can connect me with other readers who can tell me why they enjoyed
or hated book X, then just like Arnold: I'll be back.
Christopher
Locke (clocke@panix.com) is co-author
of The
Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual, which went to #4 on
the Business Week bestseller list. He is also the author of Gonzo
Marketing: Winning Through Worst Practices, named one of the top-10 business
books of 2001 by Harvard Business Review, and The
Bombast Transcripts: Rants & Screeds of RageBoy, rated R for language,
partial nudity and bad attitude.
Further reading:
Carl
Hiaasen -- more ticklish torrid tales from Florida
Luis
Rodriguez -- starting his own bookshop!
Lawrence
Schimel -- if an author writes a book, will a reader ever find it?
Brad
Barkley -- another funny guy
Browse
Archived Interviews
Browse
Archived Excerpts