|
The
Future of British Fiction is Getting Weirder
An Interview with China Mieville
by
Gavin J. Grant
 |
|
China
Mieville's third novel, The
Scar, hit bookstore shelves this summer, following hot on the
heels of his breakthrough novel, the fantastic, phantasmagorical Perdido
Street Station.
Mieville lives with his partner, writer Emma Bircham, in London, where
he set his first novel, King
Rat, a sort-of Pied Piper tale set in the world of drum'n'bass.
His fourth book, a novella called The Tain, was recently published
in the UK.
Although
his books are rich and complex, it is the simple things -- "Tea. Monsters.
Hip Hop. Video games. Political victories and fightback." -- that make
him happy.
When
he is not writing, Mieville -- who we interviewed by email -- has run
for parliament, gained a Ph.D. from the London School of Economics, and
has quickly become a favorite of readers of, as he puts it, Weird Fiction,
all over the world.
|
| |
BookSense.com: When did you start writing fiction?
Pretty much as
long ago as I can remember -- certainly from the age of about 10 onward I wanted
to write stories and have as many people as possible read them. It was in my
early 20s that I tried to get serious
about it.
Were you always
attracted to the more fantastic types of fiction?
Yes. These days
I read outside the genres as well as within, but fantastic fiction is my first
love, and it's where I always come home to. At its best, I still think it's
the very best stuff out there. Even though these days I can really enjoy a good
non-fantastic novel, I can't gear up the energy to actually write one. I'll
be surprised if I ever write anything of any length that doesn't have a fantastic
or science fiction element.
Is there any
other career that you are tempted to try?
As a young teenager
I really wanted to be a marine biologist. I finally learned to Scuba-dive recently,
which is the best thing ever. I may eventually idly try to do some marine researches,
but my science is very weak.
More recently,
I always thought I'd be an academic -- that's why I finished my Ph.D., so that
I could pursue that option if I wanted to, and if the writing didn't take off.
I still enjoy research.
King
Rat, your first novel, was set in contemporary London. What do you gain
by introducing fantastic elements into daily life?
Well hopefully
you get that classic uncanny -- the 'unheimlich', which is simultaneously
recognisable and alien. That's the coolest kind of aesthetic response you can
get, because it's the most alienating, the most unsettling, the most radical
and the most interesting. It's what the Surrealists did in their way, and what
we -- fantasists I think of as the pulp wing of Surrealism -- try to do now.
Your novels
are sometimes described as grotesques. What's a grotesque and are you writing
them?
I certainly see
myself as writing in a grotesque tradition. Of course, it's nigh impossible
to actually define, but my sense of it is a reconfiguration of the familiar
into a kind of combatively alienating experience. A woman is familiar. A beetle
is familiar. A woman whose head is a giant beetle is grotesque. A lot of genre
fantasy has recycled its own tropes so much that its stock characters and cliches
are familiar -- centaurs, for example, cool as hell as they may be, aren't grotesque
these days, at all, and elves and dwarves are positively camp. I like the grotesque
because its ornery, and also because it tends to be more grittily corporeal
-- gross, physical, fantasy. Materialist, philosophically speaking.
You toured
the U.S. and Australia earlier this year for The Scar. Was that your
first U.S. tour? How did it go?
I did a sort-of
U.S. tour for Perdido Street Station, but it only involved one public
reading. This was the first time I'd done a big, proper tour. I had a cool time.
I'm always very impressed with the seriousness with which people read Weird
Fiction. I can never quite believe that people are actually turning out for
these things, so I took to bringing a camera, and taking a quick photo of the
crowd before each gig. To which people generally responded with very good humour.
However, I got nervous because I realised it looked like a fairly craven piece
of crowd-pleasing. But dammit, I just wanted it for my records! And there was
no corollary between size of bookshop and size of crowd -- some comparatively
tiny places pulled together some brilliant numbers.
Is there a
difference between the ways U.S. and UK readers react to your books?
It's very difficult
to generalise, but there seems to be slightly more of a non-generic audience
in the U.S. than in the UK. I've been lucky in both countries, in that I've
not had readers restricted to the traditional science fiction audience, but
it seems to have broken out a little more in the U.S.. But then, it's early
days.
Apart from that,
no, I've not noticed any differences in particular. There are certain assumptions
-- stereotypes -- which are often bandied about: U.S. audiences are less forgiving
of "downbeat" books, they don't like things that are too "British"
-- but I've seen none of that in response to my stuff.
The
Scar is full of inspired physical descriptions, especially of places on
the edges of the world. Were there any places that inspired you?
Learning to scuba-dive
was very influential for all the submarine stuff. And I spent some time looking
at old ship-building yards on the south coast of England.
The world in
The Scar was long ago wounded (literally scarred) by people who attempted
to use power that was out of their control. Is The Scar a political allegory?
I think that all
science fiction or fantasy has inevitably allegorical aspects, but I also think
it's important not to suggest that that's what the book is "about":
you have to give the fantastic permission to be its own end, to follow its own
dynamic. Of course, that doesn't mean the allegorical stuff isn't there -- clearly
it is. However, I try to avoid the moral that you shouldn't Meddle With Powers
You Can't Possibly Comprehend: it has become a pretty trite and conservative
idea, I think. Instead, the political allegorisation in The Scar is about more
specific things like the dynamics of maritime imperialism, mercantilism, competing
systems of political powers, that sort of stuff. But never at the expense of
the monster story, hopefully.
Are you scared
of anything?
Unbridled imperialism.
And sharks.
Did that help
while writing?
Hell yes. I didn't
really know I was scared of sharks -- I'm fascinated with them too, I love drawing
them and watching documentaries about them, but then someone pointed out that
this was a completely neurotic and terrified obsession. And sure enough I have
nightmares about them fairly regularly. I'd love to see one while diving. But
I also think it would haunt my sleep for years.
The monsters
of The Scar and Perdido are wildly imaginative -- mosquito women,
monsters big enough to pull islands, lobster men -- is there anyone you sit
around and discuss monsters with?
I dearly wish
there was but not really. I mean, when I think of a particularly vivid one I
run and tell Emma about it, but monster-dreams are for me a primarily solitary
activity.
What's your
favorite monster?
How cruel to make
me pick one. You really going to make me pick one? I have always felt particularly
close to "The Creature From The Black Lagoon."
Are you inspired
by monster movies?
So much. I fucking
love them.
Do
you think anything has changed after the anti-corporate/World Trade Organization
protests in Seattle?
I think plenty
has, both for good and ill. The anti-capitalist movement has matured, has grown
more sophisticated, more theoretical, politically harder. There were hundreds
of obituaries of the movement after 9/11, and they've all been proved wrong
-- my partner just got back from Florence, where more than half a million
people marched through the city against war with Iraq, and that anti-war sentiment
was explicitly linked to the grass-roots anti-capitalist activism of the European
Social Forum which took place in the city at the same time.
I think the movement
is facing up to the accusations that it has been reactive, or that it has
not put any alternatives, or that it doesn't have a theory or a political program.
These accusations were always canards from the right, but now they've become
completely ridiculous.
So in short --
at the official level, you've had the acceleration of imperialism from Bush
and his Oil-ocracy, along with pathetic violent toadies like Blair, and at the
other end the grassroots movements for social justice have got more and more
exciting. As the economic crisis continues to bite, the choice is going to get
starker and starker: their way of profit-mondering mass death and misery --
or our way.
Is there a
system of government you admire and respect?
Not so much. Of
course there are variations, and I'm not an idiot -- of course I'd rather live
in a democracy, however flawed, than a dictatorship. But the supposed "socialism"
of Cuba, for example, or China, let alone North Korea, I think have very little
to do with the grass-roots democracy that I consider socialist. But of course
there are moments throughout history which provide me with 'systems of government'
I find inspirational. Above all, the early years of the Russian Revolution.
Though it was crushed by international isolation and civil war, at the start
it was the most amazing explosion of popular power, creativity, artistic and
political and moral unshackling and experimentation.
Why did you
run for parliament?
Because in the
UK the Labour Party has moved so openly and far to the right that there was
no alternative being put to the agenda of privatisation, kowtowing to big business,
scapegoating immigrants, putting the squeeze on the vulnerable, attacking trade
unions, and so on. We stood much as Nader and the Greens stood in the U.S. --
though we in the Socialist Alliance were on a much more overtly socialist platform
-- to pull the debate, to argue that there was an alternative agenda. People
have been disenfranchised by the rightward gallop of the supposed "left"
parties, and we insisted on putting an alternative.
What are you
working on now?
A new book set
in the same world as Perdido Street Station and The Scar.
What are you
reading?
Loads of stuff
-- like a lot of people, I generally have a few books on the go at the same
time, and I read them in dribs and drabs. A book about the artist James
Ensor. Brian
Stableford's Werewolves of London trilogy (The
Werewolves of London, The
Angel of Pain, The
Carnival of Destruction) because I only read the first one before. A
history of Russia by Mike Haynes -- called Russia.
What was the
first book you remember buying?
Grinny,
by Nicholas Fisk. A children's horror/sf novel that was fucking brilliant.
If
you worked in a bookshop, which books would be on your staff picks shelf?
Kelly Link's Stranger
Things Happen. Also, Anticapitalism:
A Field Guide to the Global Justice Movement, edited by Emma Bircham
(she's my partner, so this obviously looks like nepotism, but I honestly think
it's a completely invaluable book about the post-Seattle social movements).
M.
John Harrison's new science fiction opus, Light.
For Further
Reading:
Browse
Archived Interviews Browse
Archived Excerpts
|