Ann
Packer
Interview
by Ron Hogan
As
The
Dive From Clausen's Pier opens, Carrie and her fiancé Mike have
been together since high school, but at 23, Carrie is beginning to have second
thoughts about the relationship. When Mike makes that dive into unexpectedly
shallow water and becomes partially paralyzed, Carrie tries to suppress her
longing to break free out of a sense of responsibility, but the pressure gets
to her and, to the astonishment of everyone around her, she flees from Minnesota
to downtown Manhattan.
This first novel
has an "emotionally autobiographical" resonance for Packer, whose father was
paralyzed by a stroke when she was a child, "in a different way than Mike is
in the novel," she points out, "but paralyzed nonetheless. That event led me
to certain kinds of questions about life that come up again and again throughout
my writing," in short stories as well as in this debut novel.
Ron Hogan:
What was the first aspect of the story that made you start writing it?
Ann
Packer: I actually know the answer to that one, and I don't know a lot of
the answers to the "why did you write this book?" sort of questions. But I have
an entry in my notebook from about 18 months before I started writing the book:
"A woman whose husband is injured, maybe in a hunting accident." I have to assume
that I was thinking about how people cope with both the unthinkable tragedies
that happen in life and their own reactions to those tragedies. I wanted to
see what that woman would do in response to some of the terrible, terrible conflicts
within herself.
I don't know how
I got from there to the novel. It was incredibly unconscious. What I remember
about the beginning of the writing process is just sitting down and writing.
I don't know how I thought about it, but I knew the story, pretty much the entire
trajectory, when I started writing, though of course it fleshed out as I wrote,
acquiring characters and details.
You mentioned
reactions, and there's an important moment in the book, where Carrie's mother
shares her idea that we aren't good or bad people, we're people who respond
to events in ways that can be either good or bad.
Right, and those
reactions can only be understood in relation to the life that precedes them.
Everyone around
Carrie berates her for her decision to leave Mike and accuses her of selfishness
-- and she beats herself up about it as well -- but it strikes me not as a uniquely
selfish act, but as the most blatant example of something many of the characters
around Mike struggle with, in very different ways, even if they refuse to admit
it. It's easier for them to point to her in accusation.
She gives them
a way to relieve their internal pressure. Saying "How could you?" frees them
from having to look at their own conflicts about what's going on, their own
sense of their shortcomings. Everybody, in the face of one person's extraordinary
loss, is going to feel survivor guilt to some extent. So Carrie in a perverse
way helps them all by acting out an extreme form of self-preservation.
It's been
eight years since your short story collection, Mendocino and Other Stories,
was published. I know that you had children during that period, but was the
writing process a factor in that interval?
Sure. In fact,
it was more than eight years, because I actually started the novel in 1990.
During my pregnancies and my children's early infancies, I didn't work a lot,
it's true, but it took me so long to write because I kept revising. I went through
nine drafts of the novel in the space of nine or ten years. It was a matter
of exploring what the book was about through the revision process, refining
my intentions and the characters as I matured. My view of the story was about,
even though the plot never changed at all, changed significantly from 1990,
when I started it, to 1999, when I got my agent and she began to try to sell
it.
So you knew
all along that you wanted to write a novel, as opposed to being a short story
writer who decides to try doing a novel.
Well, I was
a short story writer who decided to try writing a novel, but I really wanted
to do it. I had a sense of a story that wasn't a short story; it could only
be a novel and it was never otherwise, although I did have a moment after the
first or second draft when I wondered whether I should write it as a series
of linked stories looking at different characters from their own points of view.
I didn't follow up on that passing idea, which might have been anxiety, but
it did cross my mind. At that early stage, I was still figuring out what I was
doing, so alternatives more easily presented themselves.
And because
you were already comfortable with short stories, it was a natural option.
I was familiar
with writing stories; it was what I'd been doing all along as a writer. But
writing a first novel, if you've been writing short stories, is about learning
how a novel differs from a story. Writing a first novel is always about learning
how to write a novel, in any event. I hope every novel will be about learning
to write that novel, but it's especially true of the first one.
What were
some of the most important things your first novel taught you?
I learned something
about developing and sustaining a problem over an extended period of time, so
that I never lost sight of a few central threads and tried to make sure I had
at least a sense of where each thread was at any given point. I also learned
how to leave things out in order to sustain forward momentum and keep the story
on track. So there are a lot of subplots that ended up being cut from the final
version of the novel.
One of the
things that interested me about the 10 years you spent on the novel is that
there's a certain ambiguity about exactly when the novel takes place.
There's some very contemporary cultural references, but the sense of what it
costs to live in New York seems more like the late 1980s or early 1990s.
I fudged it. (laughs)
I really didn't want to choose a specific time to set it in, and I'm not sure
why, perhaps because it took so long to write. I kept thinking that if I set
it at the time that I started writing it, it would feel dated by the time I
finished. I wanted it to be contemporary, but I think there's probably holdovers
from my period in New York, which was the early '80s. I did have a friend
who lived in a crumbling brownstone for no rent back then, although that's probably
impossible now.
Long before
you started learning firsthand how hard it is to write a novel, you grew up
with an intimate awareness of the difficulties of the writer's life.
Growing up with
a mother who was a writer, and had many friends and students who were writers,
I knew that it was not easy. I knew it was full of, at the very least, intense
challenges, and often full of failure. But when I was growing up, I never intended
to be a writer, so it didn't really matter. By the time I started writing, I
think I was able to look at it as something I was going to invent for myself,
do in my own way, separate from what I had seen, or imagined I'd seen, as a
child.
Did those
experiences help you deal with, for example, the isolation of spending eight
years between your first and second book?
I
think it did. I probably have made myself in a way that the isolation and lack
of certainty actually worked for me. I didn't really...how do I put this? It's
always been okay for me to not get what I want. That's suited some aspect of
myself that's served to hold me back and keep me invisible. So in a way, selling
the book and having it reviewed have been greater challenges for me than the
lack of certainty I faced while writing it.
How are you
dealing with the success and the great reviews?
I'm actually dealing
with it very well. I'm actually able to enjoy it and not feel overwhelmed. I've
been surprised and pleased by the extent to which I'm letting myself be happy
about it and enjoy it.
Who are some
other writers who provided inspiration and examples to you as you were learning
to write?
Ann
Beattie was a big influence on me in the early 1980s. That was a period
when I wasn't writing; I was living in New York, working in publishing, but
I was reading the stories that were published in the New Yorker, including
hers, and they influenced me a lot in terms of how I thought stories could work,
specifically about how subtle they could be and still be effective. I revere
Charles
Baxter's stories and novels. Alice
Munro has been another huge influence on me; I probably adore her writing
above all.
What have
you read recently that you enjoyed?
Atonement
by Ian McEwan. It blew me away. I read it in about 36 hours, and he's such a
fine writer that I was in a constant state of conflict about how fast I should
read. I wanted to go really slowly to savor the gorgeousness of the prose, but
it's also such an incredible pageturner. I couldn't stop myself from devouring
the book, and I'm eager to go back and read it more slowly in a year or so.
I also liked Birdsong
by Sebastian Faulks; it's another thoughtful and provocative book where you're
desperate to find out what happens next.
The Dive
From Clausen's Pier is A Top Ten Book
Sense 76 Pick:
"Packer's
first novel is the beautifully told story of Carrie Bell. When her boyfriend
breaks his neck and is paralyzed, she is faced with having to decide what it
is she owes to those she loves. The writing is wonderful, not the least bit
sentimental, and the people in the book are at once distinctive and familiar.
Carrie's choices and their consequences are surprising yet believable. At the
book's close I felt an unexpected satisfaction and pleasure with the heroine's
decisions."
- Leslie Reiner, Inkwood Books, Tampa, FL
Ron Hogan is the
editor and publisher of Beatrice.com, a collection of interviews with
authors of contemporary literary fiction and nonfiction.
Author photo
by Jerry Bauer.
Further
Reading:
Browse
Archived Interviews Browse
Archived Excerpts
|